<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VoiceOfEmerika &#187; Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emerika.com/voe/archives/tag/information/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emerika.com/voe</link>
	<description>There is no science here, only alchemy and guesswork</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:06:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not what I had hoped for</title>
		<link>http://www.emerika.com/voe/archives/86</link>
		<comments>http://www.emerika.com/voe/archives/86#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emerika.com/voe/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned in my previous post I had an idea for a long blend while in Joshua Tree. The idea was to highlight the wind in the scene. If things had gone as planned, you&#8217;d be looking at something with hard, solid rocks and other bits, contrasted with soft and fuzzy plants. Instead&#8230; as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned in my previous post I had an idea for a long blend while in Joshua Tree. The idea was to highlight the wind in the scene. If things had gone as planned, you&#8217;d be looking at something with hard, solid rocks and other bits, contrasted with soft and fuzzy plants.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.emerika.com/voe/wp-content/uploads/joshuatree-p1-crop.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-87" title="joshuatree-p1-crop" src="http://www.emerika.com/voe/wp-content/uploads/joshuatree-p1-crop.png" alt="" width="300" height="212" /></a></p>
<p>Instead&#8230; as you can see for yourself, everything is hard and crisp.</p>
<p>This is a blend of a hundred frames each five seconds apart. I&#8217;m left to mull the results and the difference from my expected outcome. Which reminds me of a great talk I just listened to:</p>
<p>Nassim Nicholas Taleb<br />
The Future Has Always Been Crazier Than We Thought<br />
Monday, February 4, 02008</p>
<p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.longnow.org/projects/seminars/">http://www.longnow.org/projects/seminars/</a> (I hesitate to deep link directly to the audio&#8211;you can find it.)</p>
<p>There is really quite a lot to think about in this talk. Hints as to my inability to predict the outcome of this photo abound.</p>
<p>So, why did this photo fail? I believe the fact that the plants tend to a center position is the answer. Well, that and the huge number of images I blended. I am going to try this again blending just a few frames. The fact I used so many images seems to just have reinforced the strength of the norm and washed out the movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emerika.com/voe/archives/86/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change in licensing!</title>
		<link>http://www.emerika.com/voe/archives/62</link>
		<comments>http://www.emerika.com/voe/archives/62#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emerika.com/voe/archives/62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Figuring out the issues around licensing has been a long road. At first non-commercial seems to make sense. The reality is that the definition of commercial is unclear. Many more things that you might think could be considered commercial. So, I have been bad mouthing non-commercial for awhile now. Imagine how silly I felt when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Figuring out the issues around licensing has been a long road. At first non-commercial seems to make sense. The reality is that the definition of commercial is unclear. Many more things that you might think could be considered commercial. So, I have been bad mouthing non-commercial for awhile now. Imagine how silly I felt when I saw that I never changed my licensing. Feel free to use or remix my movies. My licensing is now attribution only.</p>
<p>The source of a lot of what has shaped my opinion has been difficulties I experienced using other peoples work. Pretty quickly I stopped using anything that wasn&#8217;t attribution only or public domain. Keeping track of a bunch of different licenses is such a bother. I&#8217;m happy to attribute all, even if it&#8217;s public domain, but further than that becomes too limiting.</p>
<p>As long as I have the floor, I&#8217;ll throw a rock at the freedom Nazis. I&#8217;ve lost all patience with people trying to force their idea of <strong>free</strong> on me. Hello! We&#8217;re talking free right? This share-alike business, super annoying. It seems all lovely dovey, but really these people promoting it are just control freaks. So, I can use people&#8217;s share-alike stuff, only there are conditions. One condition is that I must control what people do with my stuff, perhaps our stuff is better said. Can I give it away? Nope. The only people that can use my stuff must give it away and require that others do the same. &#8211;SIGH&#8211;  Now imagine you&#8217;re trying to use stuff with different licenses? Ugh! When people tell me my stuff is not free enough because it doesn&#8217;t have enough restrictions I want to throw them out a window. Pretty soon I&#8217;ll go public domain&#8211;see how they like that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.emerika.com/voe/archives/62/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

